Editorial, sources, and corrections policy

Source hierarchy

• Current legislation, official court and government services, forms, and fee pages come first.
• Established public-rights resources may add context but do not replace the controlling source.
• Law-firm and competitor pages may inform user-language research; they are not treated as legal authority.

Publication and review gate

• Every legal page must identify its official sources and editorial source-check date.
• A human editor checks factual statements against the cited primary sources and confirms that uncertainty and product boundaries are visible before publication.
• The initial knowledge library is written and checked in Hebrew. A future translation will not be presented as equivalent or indexed unless its meaning and sources are checked separately.
• A page with missing sources, source-check information, or clear boundaries remains an unpublished draft.

Use of AI

AI may assist with outlining, plain-language editing, or translation drafts. It may not publish or silently update legal information. A human editor checks factual statements against the cited sources and confirms the page clearly distinguishes general organization from case-specific legal advice.

Corrections and updates

• Material corrections change the visible modification or review date.
• Time-sensitive pages are checked when an official source changes and on a scheduled review cycle.
• Old fees and forms are not copied when a stable link to a live official page is safer.
• A dedicated corrections contact must be published before legal pages become indexable.

Content we do not publish as general guidance

• Recommendations about the “best” forum or litigation tactic.
• Predictions, guaranteed timelines, award calculations, or case valuations.
• Filing-ready pleadings or agreements without an appropriate lawyer-supervised service.
• Mass-generated pages created only to target a keyword.